Book Review
Zona: A Book About a Film About a Journey to a Room by Geoff Dyer

There was a fair amount of buzz surrounding this book when it was released back in February. And I’ve been itching to read this ever since. It definitely lives up to the hype. I’ve read a few essays in various magazines and newspapers by Dyer but nothing of significant length, so reading this was a bit of a delight. One trademark of Dyer is his attention to detail and this book is very much about details.
The premise of the book is straightforward and exactly what you would expect with that title. It is a book about a film about a journey to a room. It is a detailed analysis of Andre Tarkovsky’s Russian SF masterpiece: Stalker.
Many reviewers have commented on the fact that a familiarity with the film is not a prerequisite for his book but I decided to go ahead and watch the film prior to my read. I’ve read detailed accounts of media that I am not familiar with and while one can still absorb the information that is being analysed, without viewing the original work the finer nuances are lost. Missing out on those finer points just nags at the back of my brain. But, I digress. The point is that one need not be familiar with the film in order to read this work, it’s just that like all media - familiarity breeds deeper comprehension.
I watched the film in one sitting and I finished the book in another. I’m not certain if this was simply a result of the type of mood I was in or if Tarkovsky and Dyer tap into some deep-seated obsessions from within.
It’s difficult to describe the film but if I must: SF Wizard of Oz set in a Russian post-industrial landscape. The film is about three men who attempt to venture into “The Zone” a barren and desolate landscape that may or may not contain fantastical remnants from a supposed meteorite that crashed into the area. A government authority now controls access in and out of “The Zone”.
Three men: Stalker (our tour guide and the only one who has previously visited the Zone) offers to sneak in Writer and Professor into the mysterious and unknown.
The film is slow, plodding, and much of it philosophical. It’s definitely not for everyone. The first 9 minutes are without dialogue and consist entirely of drips, creaks, groans. It’s an art-house film, the type of movie that film-study graduates argue about in coffee-houses. And bored hotel-owners.
So you’re thinking, why would you want to read a book about this film. Well, that’s exactly why I wanted to read it. I love books that are so narrowly focused on such a specific piece of media. There’s something beautiful about this type of obsession and attention to detail. And Geoff Dyer is obsessional about the details of this film. The book is largely an essay-length film critique, and the first half consists of a scene by scene break down of the entire film. As I mentioned earlier, one need not have watched the film in order to enjoy this book (Dyer anticipates this and does half the work for you).
What follows is a wonderful account of Russian film history, media studies, literary analysis, and a semi-biographical account of why we obsess over the things we obsess about. Dyer delves deep into the making of this film as well as his first experience with film as a medium and what it does to us to confront these types of images.
‘If the regular length of a shot is increased, one becomes bored, but if you keep on making it longer, a new quality emerges, a special intensity of attention.’ At first there can be a friction between our expectations of time and Tarkovsky-time and this friction is increasing in the twenty-first century as we move further and further away from Tarkovsky-time towards moron-time in which nothing can last—and no one can concentrate on anything—for longer than about two seconds. Soon people will not be able to watch films like Theo Angelopoulos’s Ulysses’ Gaze or to read Henry James because they wil not have the concentration to get from one interminable scene or sentence to the next. The time when I might have been able to read late-period Henry James has passed and because I have not read late-period Henry James I am in no position to say what harm has been done to my sensibility by not having done so.
As you can see there is a certain amount of tongue-in-cheek humor involved with his criticism/re-telling.
The book is in a weird place, not pure criticism nor a proper film review (too short for the former, too long for the latter). It’s one man’s passion, detailed and thorough. This is an odd way to frame it but it’s the perfect bathroom read. It’s a short novella length essay and I think it’s worth picking up. Even if you’ve not watched the film, you’ll walk away with your eyes open. An open love letter to a film.



